Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BoomRun HooQ's avatar

Building the actual skill in a fresh chat window instead of the one you used to test it is advice that goes against almost everything else I've read about this. Inheriting every wrong decision from the test ground makes obvious sense in hindsight, but I would have packaged it in-place without a second thought.

Mohamed F. Ahmed's avatar

I built an internal agent last year that I was convinced was "insanely good" because it nailed every test case I threw at it. Then I handed it to someone else on the team and it fell apart in about ten minutes, turns out I'd unconsciously trained my prompts around my own workflow quirks. Curious if you've hit that same wall: does "insanely good" hold up when someone other than the builder is driving it?

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?